U.S. vs. Foreign Nativity and 10-Year Trajectories of Mental Health after Traumatic Brain Injury: A Model Systems Study.

BACKGROUND: Previous research has found racial and ethnic disparities in life satisfaction, depression, and anxiety after traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, limited studies have examined differences in these variables between U.S.- and foreign-born individuals with TBI. The purpose of this study was to examine whether differences exist in mental health outcomes between U.S.- and foreign-born individuals with TBI at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years after injury, as well as examine whether demographic and injury-related characteristics account for these differences. METHOD: Participants were 8289 individuals with TBI who identified as U.S.-born and 944 who identified as born outside the U.S. in the TBI Model Systems study. Participants completed measures of mental health outcomes at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years after injury. RESULTS: Foreign-born individuals with TBI had comparable levels of depression and anxiety trajectories to U.S.-born individuals, yet higher life satisfaction trajectories, even after controlling for demographic and injury-related variables. CONCLUSION: Rehabilitation professionals should consider in their clinical work the mechanisms that likely influence mental health outcomes among foreign-born individuals, including family-based values that increase resilience, as well as the possible under-reporting of mental health symptoms along the lines of cultural norms.

Influence of Foreign Versus US Nativity on the Trajectory of Functional Independence Over the 10 Years After Traumatic Brain Injury: A Model Systems Study.

OBJECTIVE: Although racial/ethnic disparities have been documented in numerous outcomes after traumatic brain injury (TBI), research has yet to explore differences in rehabilitation outcomes based upon nativity (foreign-born vs US-born individuals). The purpose of this study was to compare the functional outcomes over the first 10 years after TBI for individuals born in the United States with those who were foreign-born. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: A sample of 10 695 individuals in the TBI Model Systems database with a coding for country of birth the United States ( n = 9435) versus other than the United States ( n = 1260) was used. DESIGN/MAIN MEASURES: Outcome measures at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years after TBI included the Motor and Cognitive subscales of the Functional Independence Measure and the Supervision Rating Scale. RESULTS: Foreign-born individuals exhibited lower motor functional independence trajectories than those born in the United States, even after controlling for demographic and injury-related covariates. However, foreign-born individuals generally showed a stronger upward quadratic trajectory in motor functional independence with the greatest gains between the 5- and 10-year time points, whereas those born in the United States improved more quickly but then plateaued between the 5- and 10-year time points; these differential effects over time dissipated with the addition of demographic and injury-related covariates. Foreign-born individuals also exhibited lower cognitive functional independence trajectories, as well as greater supervision needs trajectories, than those born in the United States, even after controlling for demographic and injury-related covariates. CONCLUSION: These findings dovetail with literature suggesting that racially/ethnically diverse groups exhibit reduced functional independence after TBI. The findings may also suggest potential systematic barriers such as healthcare access and language barriers that may influence the frequency, rate, and quality of care received. The results highlight the importance of uncovering cultural distinctions and can aid in facilitating research examining foreign nativity-based disparities following TBI.

Exploring racial performance disparities with the Modified Mini-Mental State Exam (3MS) in an acute brain injury rehabilitation setting.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: The Modified Mini-Mental State Exam (3MS) is a brief, widely used cognitive screening tool. This study examined differences in 3MS performance between Black and White individuals undergoing acute brain injury rehabilitation. RESEARCH METHOD/DESIGN: Participants were Black (44.1%; n = 78) and White (55.9%; n = 99) individuals admitted over a 2-year period to inpatient rehabilitation for an acute neurological injury or illness at a major, urban mid-Atlantic medical center. An attending psychologist administered the 3MS during assessment at admission, and demographic and injury-related information was extracted from electronic medical records. RESULTS: While there were no significant racial differences in the subsamples' gender, employment status, marital status, years of education, or days on the rehabilitation unit, Black participants were older and had a higher proportion of focal injuries or stroke. There were no significant racial differences in 3MS total scores. At the item level, Black participants scored lower on abstract reasoning, repetition, visuospatial construction, and comprehension. When adjusting for age and type of injury, significant differences remained in repetition and comprehension. The 3MS's internal consistency was adequate and comparable across races, as were item-total correlations, with the exception of White participants having a larger item-total correlation for the basic attention item. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: These findings underscore a point of caution about interpreting the results of a cognitive screening measure like the 3MS without the context of an individual's neurological history and race. Black individuals might be at risk for being inappropriately screened to be cognitively impaired, and some level of racial sensitivity should be taken at the item level for repetition and comprehension constructs. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Clinical utility and psychometric properties of the Ableist Microaggressions Scale.

Comments on an article by K. J. Conover et al. (see record 2017-30398-007). Conover and colleagues developed and validated the self report Ableist Microaggressions Scale (AMS). Using factor analysis, the authors identified four subscales, including Helplessness, Minimization, Denial of Personhood, and Otherization. The psychometric properties of the AMS have been examined with adults with a range of disability types. The AMS consists of 20 items, and each item is scored on a 6- point Likert scale ranging from 0 (never) to 5 (very frequently). Total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting greater experiences of microaggressions. Three positively worded items are reverse scored. The initial validation study included a sample size of 1,392 participants with various types of disabilities, an average age of 34, and a higher proportion of participants who identified as female relative to other sex/gender expressions, the majority of the sample identified as heterosexual and White. In this study, the AMS had good total-score internal consistency with a Cronbach's alpha of .91; three of the four subscales generally showed adequate as given their number of items: .83 for Helplessness, .90 for Denial of Personhood, and .84 for Otherization. However, the Minimization subscale displayed relatively weaker internal consistency with an a of .65. Additionally, the AMS showed adequate item-total correlations ranging from .21 to .77. Despite the high potential of the AMS to be used in research and clinical work, there are several limitations. The original validation study sample was comprised primarily of White heterosexual participants which may warrant caution in applications to racially/ethnically diverse groups and sexual minorities. Because individuals with mild-to-moderate disability may be less likely to participate in research, caution should also be exercised regarding generalizability to and use with more severe disability groups, including individuals with psychiatric disabilities. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Spanish Translation and Psychometric Validation of a Measure of Acculturative Stress among Latinx Immigrants in the USA.

BACKGROUND: In the United States, the Latinx community is growing at a faster rate than any other racial or ethnic minority group. Members of this community have been found to experience a number of acculturative stressors after immigrating, including xenophobia, racism, and discrimination. Although several scales have been created in recent years to measure acculturative stress in Spanish-speaking immigrants, they are long, do not have nuanced subscales, or have not been validated in an extremely diverse sample of Latinx immigrants. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the current study was to translate and psychometrically validate the Riverside Acculturative Stress Inventory (RASI) in a diverse sample of Spanish-speaking immigrants. METHODS: A sample of 202 Latinx immigrants in the United States completed the RASI as well as measures of depression and anxiety. RESULTS: An initial confirmatory factor analysis suggested that the overall subscale factor structure was not an ideal fit for the data. An exploratory factor analysis suggested the retention of four subscales, each with three items, forming a 12-item Spanish RASI short form. As indices of convergent validity, the RASI total score was positively associated with depression and anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from the study contribute to the literature a brief and valid assessment of acculturative stress in Spanish-speaking immigrants. The RASI Spanish short form holds promise to stimulate research on the unique adversities experienced by Latinx immigrants.

Suicidal ideation after acute traumatic brain injury: A longitudinal actor-partner interdependence model of patients and caregivers in Latin America.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is associated with depression, anxiety, and even suicidality in individuals with TBI and in caregivers. Moreover, emotional functioning in individuals with TBI is linked with caregiver functioning. However, no known studies to date have examined linkages in suicidal ideation in individuals with TBI and family caregivers. This is especially important in Latin America, where TBI rates are high, and where cultural norms influence family caregiving. This study examined associations among self-reported suicidal ideation in individuals with TBI and their primary caregivers over time in Mexico and Colombia. Research Method/Design: A total of 109 individuals and their primary caregivers completed measures during hospitalization for TBI and at 2- and 4-months posthospitalization. The primary outcome was Item 9 from the Spanish version of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, assessing for thoughts of death or suicide in the previous 2 weeks. RESULTS: Patients and caregivers reported high levels of suicidal ideation (18.3%-22.4% and 12.4%-15.7%, respectively) at each time point, and suicidal ideation at one time point strongly predicted ideation at the next. When patients endorsed suicidal ideation in the hospital, their caregivers tended to endorse suicidal ideation 2 months later. Although unaccounted for variables could be driving these relationships, they may also provide possible evidence of causal preponderance between patient and caregiver suicidal ideation post-TBI. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Clinicians and rehabilitation specialists can use these findings to inform suicide risk assessment by expanding these practices to caregivers of patients who endorsed suicidal ideation. Interventions after TBI should incorporate caregivers given this study showed significant interdependence of suicidality between patients and caregivers. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Is Helping Really Helping? Health-Related Quality of Life after TBI Predicting Caregiver Depression Symptom Trajectories in Latin America.

Previous research connecting health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in people with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and caregiver mental health has primarily been conducted cross-sectionally in the U.S. and Western Europe. This study, therefore, examined how HRQoL in individuals immediately after their TBI predicts longitudinal caregiver depression symptom trajectories in Latin America. A sample of 109 patients with an acute TBI and 109 caregivers (total n = 218) was recruited from three hospitals in Mexico City, Mexico, and in Cali and Neiva, Colombia. TBI patients reported their HRQoL while they were still in hospital, and caregivers reported their depression symptoms at the same time and at 2 and 4 months later. Hierarchal linear models (HLM) found that caregiver depression symptom scores decreased over time, and lower patient mental health and pain-related quality of life at baseline (higher pain) predicted higher overall caregiver depression symptom trajectories across the three time points. These findings suggest that in Latin America, there is an identifiable relationship between psychological and pain-related symptoms after TBI and caregiver depression symptom outcomes. The results highlight the importance of early detection of caregiver mental health needs based in part upon patient HRQoL and a culturally informed approach to rehabilitation services for Latin American TBI caregivers.

Relationship Satisfaction and Depression After Traumatic Brain Injury: An Actor-Partner Interdependence Model of Patients and Caregivers in Mexico and Colombia.

OBJECTIVE: Traumatic brain injury represents a major public health concern, particularly in low- and middle-income countries like in Latin America. Family members are often caregivers for individuals with traumatic brain injury, which can result in significant stress. Research is needed to examine depression and quality of the caregiving relationship in these dyads. This study examined relationship quality and depression longitudinally after traumatic brain injury within the caregiving relationship. DESIGN: Dyads (N = 109) composed of individuals with traumatic brain injury and their caregivers were recruited from three hospitals in Mexico and Colombia. They self-reported depression and relationship satisfaction during hospitalization and at 2 and 4 mos after hospitalization. RESULTS: A 2-lag Actor Partner Interdependence Model demonstrated that patients and caregivers reporting high relationship satisfaction at baseline experienced lower depression 2 mos later, which then predicted higher caregiver relationship satisfaction at 4 mos. Moreover, patients with high relationship satisfaction at baseline had caregivers with lower depression at 2 mos, which was then associated with patients' higher satisfaction at 4 mos. CONCLUSIONS: Within individuals with traumatic brain injury and caregivers, depression and relationship satisfaction seem to be inversely related. Furthermore, patients' and caregivers' depression and relationship satisfaction impact each other over time, demonstrating interdependence within the caregiving relationship.